Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Cassandra's column >>

CASSANDRA

Fighting for a Rational World
Articles Posted: 7  Links Seeded: 59
Member Since: 2/2006  Last Seen: 2/12/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Katrina-Revisionist-History-Gate: Bush Admin Lies Again

Fri Aug 1, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
bush, mccain, ecology, off-shore-drilling, government-lies, oill-spills-katrina-rita
By Cassandra
Advertise | AdChoices

On the "Bushed" segment of Countdown on July 31, Keith Olbermann quoted figures from a government report indicating that Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman had lied to the American people in stating that there were no oil spills following Katrina and Rita. Since this is one of the arguments McCain and the Bush administration are using to try to convince the country to go with more off-shore drilling, I was interested to track down the report. This is particularly significant to me, because I live in North Carolina and have great fears about the off-shore oil construction these guys are pushing leading to spills that will destroy the delicate ecosystem of the Fish and Wildlife preserves along the NC coast. The following is an excerpt from page 28 the report in question:

"TECHNICAL REPORT

MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
PIPELINE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT FROM HURRICANES
KATRINA AND RITA IN THE GULF OF MEXICO
REPORT NO. 448 14183
01-22-2007

The summary analysis of oil spills was presented by the Region Response Team for the MMS
and was the source of the data in Table 2. The data is categorized by storm and source locations,
and captures all spills one barrel or larger from federal OCS facilities that resulted from damages
related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. As a result of both storms, 124 spills were reported with
a total volume of roughly 17,700 barrels of total petroleum products, of which about 13,200
barrels were crude oil and condensate from platforms, rigs and pipelines, and 4,500 barrels were
refined products from platforms and rigs. Pipelines were accountable for 72 spills totaling about 7,300 barrels of crude oil and condensates pilled into the GOM."

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Cassandra's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Carolinas
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (10)
Frank Scott

Thanks for this, Cassandra. I live in California, and most of us in this state don't want those offshore oil rigs polluting our coastline. Tourism is a major industry here, and oil spills have the potential to create great harm to our economy. The oil companies need to use the leases they already have in this country, and begin to develop more alternative energy sources with their record profits.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Aug 1, 2008 2:00 PM EDT
Erik the Read

Yes, "something" is not "nothing". On the other hand, the Gulf of Mexico produces oil of a type called "light, sweet" (so I've been told) and this evaporates quickly, helped by waves. We need to know what the drillers used to prevent the spread of that oil and how much oil reached shore. Since people were taken off those rigs in plenty of time, the companies must have deemed the risk to the rigs as being high. They also removed the people who could do anything about spills. It is realistic to demand no spills at all.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Fri Aug 1, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
Reply
follow the money

yea.
thanks for the heads up...
just like exxon,
and us trying to let us forget about the oil spills like in the 1950s
they had an oil spill in the river..new york,?
you can search
exxon on the web, and find out a lot of these companys..
oil companies may try to bury the evidence,
but with people on the vine from all over the world,
and we can all
keep track on these companys.

maybe keep them honest for a while?

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Aug 1, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
Celestina

Keeping track is the hard part, but this is a start.
We don't have cute, furry baby seals here, but one has to wonder what the effect of pictures of floundering seagulls and dolphins would be on the "ecological awareness" of the region...

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Sat Aug 2, 2008 12:08 AM EDT
Cassandra

Keeping them honest doesn't seem to happen. The Bushies (and McCain) seem to have sold the American people on off-shore drilling as a "necessity." I understand that a bill is coming up before Congress, and even Obama is getting reading to make a speech with a "compromise" position. This makes me a little sick.

  • 4 votes
#2.2 - Sat Aug 2, 2008 8:40 AM EDT
Maxwell Despard

I don't understand it. Why invest time and money in more infrastructure that should ideally be temporary, and runs the risk of lowering prices just enough for people to get complacent? Especially when MIT has found a way to store solar energy. As things stand, we could transition to wind and solar almost completely within 10 years.

I really don't like Obama. It would have been nice if Kucinich or Gravel had gotten a fair shot.

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Sat Aug 2, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
Reply
Djehuty

It wouldn't be the first lie, but it sure indicates a pattern.

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Sat Aug 2, 2008 2:20 AM EDT
Walt D

As a former resident of CA and present resident of NC, I am deeply concerned by the Bush administration's 4th quarter push for drilling.

On the other hand, I realize these hardworking corporate drones have traded in many favors and probably not an insignificant amount of money to ensure helmetboy's election and reelection, so they're just trying to get their hand washed before the curtain falls.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Aug 2, 2008 2:38 PM EDT
Cassandra

Walt, I heard Obama talking about the bill before Congress yesterday, and he said he thinks this is the best compromise we can get. He said it builds in every safety guarantee anybody could think of and as a tradeoff the payments to the oil companies will stop and that money will be invested in alternative energy research. He also said he is still not really convinced that off-shore drilling will do much to offset the immediate energy crunch. I guess not, with 12 years required for implementation!

I know Obama sees himself as The Great Compromiser, but this really disappoints me. Fifteen years from now, when we have no remaining wildlife preserve wetlands along the coast, just sludge-filled swamps, his "reasonableness" is not going to be a good enough excuse. Although I do admit, it appears that their sound bites on television have allowed the administration and McCain to sell the American people on it. I suppose, if they kept telling people that the only way to survive the recession is to reduce the number of people in the world, folks would start slaughtering their children. Some folks would rather do anything than think.

  • 5 votes
#4.1 - Sun Aug 3, 2008 9:12 AM EDT
Djehuty

I know Obama sees himself as The Great Compromiser, but this really disappoints me.

Yes. Because "compromise" is how the numbers men win. The only answer is "principle", and he used to know that. He'd better remember fast.

  • 2 votes
#4.2 - Sun Aug 3, 2008 7:29 PM EDT
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com